2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1971 ZIL 114
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1971 ZIL 114. (296 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1971 ZIL 114.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 ZIL 114 (581 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1971 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1971 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Jaguar | ZIL |
Model | XF | 114 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 581 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3770 mm |