2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1973 Rover P5B
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover P5B would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1973 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1973 Rover P5B.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Rover P5B. (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1973 Rover P5B | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XF | P5B |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3526 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2820 mm |