2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Jaguar | Skoda |
| Model | XF | L |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |
