2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1994 Opel Omega
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (207 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Opel Omega. (270 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1994 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jaguar | Opel |
Model | XF | Omega |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |