2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 586 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (435 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XF | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2701 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 435 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1771 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |