2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 638 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XF | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |