2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1996 Mazda MS-9
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-9 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MS-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MS-9 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1996 Mazda MS-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XF | MS-9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1800 mm |