2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. (408 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 437 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XF | F200 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 408 HP |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 259 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
