2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar XF. (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar XF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 29 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | XF | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2720 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1771 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2390 mm |
