2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2001 MG X10
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X10 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2001 MG X10. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X10.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 2001 MG X10 | |
| Make | Jaguar | MG |
| Model | XF | X10 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
