2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2001 Renault Clio. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 780 kg more than 2001 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (207 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio. 2009 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2001 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2001 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2001 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XF | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.1 seconds | 7.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |