2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XF | Dingo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2450 mm |
