2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar XF. (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (800 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (560 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XF | CL |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 800 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 88 L |