2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2005 Lincoln Aviator
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 348 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2005 Lincoln Aviator | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | XF | Aviator |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 2190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 85 L |