2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2005 Lincoln LS

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (235 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln LS. (232 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 8 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (293 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XF 2005 Lincoln LS
Make Jaguar Lincoln
Model XF LS
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 2964 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 232 HP
Torque 293 Nm 298 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1679 kg 1687 kg
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2920 mm 3020 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.8 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L