2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 2 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (436 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XF | Tribute |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 436 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 62 L |