2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar XF. (235 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar XF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 241 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XF | XC90 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 293 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 237 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1679 kg | 1438 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |