2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore. 2009 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2008 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XF | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |