2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2012 BMW X3

To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (311 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar XF. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar XF.

Because 2012 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X3 (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XF 2012 BMW X3
Make Jaguar BMW
Model XF X3
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2993 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 311 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3300 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 630 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4648 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1881 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1675 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 5.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 6.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 67 L