2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1958 Volvo 120
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1958 Volvo 120. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1958 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Volvo 120. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XJ | 1958 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ | 120 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |