2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1962 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1188 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XJ | 1962 Renault 4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJ | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 546 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 34 L |