2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1962 Simca Oceane
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca Oceane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca Oceane would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1962 Simca Oceane. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca Oceane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 695 kg more than 1962 Simca Oceane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Simca Oceane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Simca Oceane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Simca Oceane. (90 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Simca Oceane. 2009 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1962 Simca Oceane has manual transmission. 1962 Simca Oceane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XJ | 1962 Simca Oceane | |
| Make | Jaguar | Simca |
| Model | XJ | Oceane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 7.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 43 L |
