2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1964 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (120 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (190 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XJ | 1964 Reliant Scimitar | |
| Make | Jaguar | Reliant |
| Model | XJ | Scimitar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4200 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 297 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2340 mm |
