2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1968 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1968 Morris Oxford. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1968 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XJ | 1968 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Jaguar | Morris |
Model | XJ | Oxford |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |