2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 265 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XJ | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | XJ | Type E |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |
