2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XJ | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2760 mm |