2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1985 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XJ | 1985 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
| Model | XJ | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1859 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 297 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2400 mm |
