2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1996 Tata E220

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1996 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1996 Tata E220.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Tata E220. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Tata E220. 2009 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1996 Tata E220 has manual transmission. 1996 Tata E220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XJ 1996 Tata E220
Make Jaguar Tata
Model XJ E220
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4200 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 297 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2810 mm