2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 984 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XJ | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | AZ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2370 mm |