2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 39 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XJ | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJ | Zo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 293 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 83 L |
