2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 2002 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback.

Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Subaru Outback. (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Subaru Outback.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XJ 2002 Subaru Outback
Make Jaguar Subaru
Model XJ Outback
Year Released 2009 2002
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4200 cc 2457 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 297 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 224 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 64 L