2009 Jaguar XJ vs. 2008 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2008 Ford Falcon. (261 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XJ. (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XJ.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XJ 2008 Ford Falcon
Make Jaguar Ford
Model XJ Falcon
Year Released 2009 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4200 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 297 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 391 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 68 L