2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 202 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Jaguar | Studebaker |
Model | XK | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1502 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |