2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 115 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XK.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XK | Grand Wagoneer |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |