2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (254 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 707 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (353 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XK | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |