2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 125 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1340 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2850 mm |