2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 660 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XK 1977 Mazda RX-2
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK RX-2
Year Released 2009 1977
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 410 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 560 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1340 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2480 mm