2009 Jaguar XK vs. 1998 Mazda 323

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 665 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323. 2009 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1998 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1998 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jaguar XK 1998 Mazda 323
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK 323
Year Released 2009 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 410 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 560 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.3 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1785 kg 1120 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 71 L 55 L