2009 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercedes-Benz A would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. (91 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 430 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XK.
Because 2009 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. (180 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 2001 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XK | A |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1898 cc |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 80 L |