2009 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 635 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 280 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 50 L |