2009 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 705 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XK | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2550 mm |