2009 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 552 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XK | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XK | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2550 mm |
