2009 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 255 kg more than 1995 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Cherokee | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Cherokee | Villager |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |