2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (347 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1795 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Simca 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1942 Simca 5 | |
Make | Jeep | Simca |
Model | Commander | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 347 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2010 mm |