2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1238 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Jeep | Saab |
Model | Commander | 92 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2480 mm |