2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 147 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
Make | Jeep | Plymouth |
Model | Commander | Belvedere |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2930 mm |