2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Jeep | Studebaker |
Model | Commander | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 68 L |