2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1963 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (81 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 368 kg more than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (453 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 1963 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Jeep | Sunbeam |
| Model | Commander | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 453 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 40 L |
