2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1543 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Commander | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 66 L |
