2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Commander | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |